Tabletopocalypse, Follow-up

Sure, people say that they want more positivity, but negative topics are apparently are far more likely to spark conversation. My Tabletopocalypse Now post has 70-odd comments here at the blog (more than I’ve ever seen for any other post), as well as extensive (and varying degrees of ridiculous/frustrating/infuriating) discussions at RPGnet, ENWorld, The RPGsite, Circvs Maximvs, RPGgeek, and dozens of blogs.

I figured that there would be some hullaballoo over my post — I said as much in the post which preceded it. I completely underestimated the level of vitriol.

My take-aways from this: Continue reading “Tabletopocalypse, Follow-up”

Tour de Bond: For Your Eyes Only (1960)

For Your Eyes Only is a monument to the adage that the best writers never let a good idea go to waste. In 1958, CBS Television offered Ian Fleming a contract for a television show based on the James Bond character. Fleming agreed and prepared a set of outlines for the first episodes of the proposed series — a combination of adaptations of his earlier novels, along with new material. Unfortunately, CBS eventually dropped the idea, and the series never happened. The new material Fleming had created, though, wouldn’t go to waste.

Gathering up the five original outlines that he had developed for the series, Fleming expanded them into short stories — the plots, developed for series television, weren’t detailed enough for full-length novels. The stories– “From a View to a Kill”, “For Your Eyes Only”, “Quantum of Solace”, “Risico” and “The Hildebrand Rarity” — were published as a collection originally titled For Your Eyes Only – Five Secret Occasions in the Life of James Bond (although the subtitle was dropped in later editions).
Continue reading “Tour de Bond: For Your Eyes Only (1960)”

Mark Waid on Digital

When I attended the ICV2 Conference on Comics and Digital at the NYCC, I had the opportunity to speak briefly with Mark Waid.

Waid has made supposedly “controversial” comments regarding the future of his industry, which was construed completely wrong-headedly by a depressingly large amount of people. Sound familiar?

Anyway — He did an interview with Newsarama later on at the show, and was given an opportunity to expand upon his statements and hopefully clarify them for those that misunderstood. Click here to watch the (sadly non-embeddable) video.