Y’know….
Maybe, just maybe, a candidate’s wins can be attributed to the candidates themselves, rather than their opponents.
But no — according to the latest media narrative, Obama’s 2-to-1 victory in South Carolina, where he drew more votes than the top two candidates in last week’s Republican primary combined, is apparently “a rebuke of the Clinton’s strategy,” rather than, oh I dunno, people voting for him because they feel that he’s the best candidate.
Nah, couldn’t be that. Everything’s got to be about Hill and Bill, even in defeat.