NY Times all but rescinds their endorsement of Clinton

The editorial in today’s NY Times. Click and read.

The most damning quote– Arguing that through her negativity and use of Rove tactics “she undercuts the rationale for her candidacy that led this page and others to support her: that she is more qualified, right now, to be president than Mr. Obama.

Ouch.

As the Times pointed out — Pennsylvania changed nothing, except further solidifying the divide in the party. We’re in for at least another 2 weeks, until North Carolina and Indiana — which I expect Obama will win.

Not that it matters, of course. As Andrew Sullivan points out, she is going to take this thing to the last day of the Convention in August. It’s her only way to “win.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.